Contributed by Brian Englar. Check out more of their posts from this summer here.

If I wanted to, I could walk right through the front doors of Serbia’s National Assembly without seeing a single security guard or camera. I live directly behind it, I can pick out the Prime Minister’s car from the unguarded lot, and yet, not once have I seen more than a meter-maid patrolling the building’s adjacent park or street parking spots.

It’s a bizarre notion for an American citizen, something I didn’t expect to see. The White House is likely one of the most secure buildings in the world. Few ever get the privilege of getting any closer to the Oval Office than standing outside the wrought-iron fences of Pennsylvania Avenue. Wholly disregarding the matter of security checks for entry, cleared tourists couldn’t even take photos in the building before the ban was lifted this past year.

What results is a sense of physical distance between citizen and executive, a sense I expected to find duplicated in nearly all government institutions. What’s surprised me is that, in Belgrade, I’ve found entirely the opposite.

While, in the US, there’s such a prominent physical distance – made apparent by security cameras, checkpoints, guards and guard dogs at government offices – I think many would agree that political distance – by that I mean the belief that elected officials (for the most part) attempt to follow public opinion – between official and constituent is relatively small. This claim may seem overly idealistic, but I mean it in terms relative to the entirety of the world, where dictators and monarchies still strangle the seats of power.

In Belgrade, the political situation is tense to say the least. Few seem to support the recently-reelected Prime Minister Vučić, as some cry election fraud, others point out the shadowy work of his officers, and still more remain confused by the unstable balancing act he attempts to maintain between the West and Putin. Biweekly protests, originally sparked by citizen backlash against the massive foreign-led urban gentrification project the city has seen (called Belgrade Waterfront), have taken on new meaning, being described by local media as even purely “anti-Vučić.” The demonstrations draw nearly 25,000 protesters each iteration, shut down busy streets for hours, and are still growing. And yet many still think government will continue as usual regardless – that the protests’ spark will fizzle out, as the National Assembly continues undisturbed but paradoxically, seemingly approachable.

It’s a strange dichotomy to observe: a government with no physical distance between itself and its citizens but such strong political distance. It can sometimes even feel that on my way to work, I pass the office window of an institutional oppressor.

But on the surface, it seems much less of a problem. It seems almost a part of the propaganda endlessly fed to the ubiquitous state-supporting media, a deception.


One thought on “Distance

  1. Yes, now that you mention it, we see almost no evidence of security. Last week in Paris i noticed soldiers in battle garb fatigues, many carrying serious weapons, patrolling the streets — and not only in tourist areas. Another surprise about Belgrade is how safe it is; even on deserted streets in the evenings people seem unconcerned about crime. Have Serbians asked you about US security and the murders in recent weeks? Did the US ambassador comment on US security and our image abroad? As i read your account, i thought about how different the issues are that rouse Americans and Serbians to protest. Keep on reporting — this is a fascinating time.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s